Anderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee
Case Overview
A case in which the Court will decide whether a complaint alleging a fiduciary breach in ERISA underperformance cases must include allegations of a "meaningful benchmark" to survive the pleading stage.
The Application
Anderson alleges that Intel's Investment Policy Committee breached its fiduciary duty by selecting underperforming investments. The central question is whether the complaint adequately alleges imprudence without explicitly identifying the benchmark used to measure that underperformance.
The Conclusion
The case is active and pending. The Court will determine whether meaningful-benchmark allegations are a pleading requirement for ERISA underperformance claims to survive dismissal.
No circuit court data for this case.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support