← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank v. Citibank, N.A.

No. 1:25-cv-00820 District · Active Active
Court
D.D.C.
dcd
Judge
Tanya S. Chutkan
Filed
Mar 8, 2025
Judge (CL)
Tanya S. Chutkan
Filed (CL)
Mar 19, 2025
CL Status
active

Case Overview

Climate United sued Citibank and the EPA over Citibank's refusal to disburse the National Clean Investment Fund contractually obligated to Climate United due to pressure from the federal government. This case was consolidated with similar suits brought by Power Forward Communities, California, Maine, Illinois, and Minnesota state green banks, and the Justice Climate Fund.


The Application

History

Citibank held contractual obligations under the National Clean Investment Fund to disburse funds to Climate United, but allegedly refused disbursement due to federal pressure from the executive freeze on financial assistance. Plaintiffs challenge whether the freeze validly authorized Citibank's withholding and seek recovery for breach of contract and violation of the APA.

The Conclusion

The case remains active in D.C. District Court before Judge Chutkan, consolidated with parallel suits by state green banks and climate entities, challenging the legality and contractual effect of the federal funding freeze as of the March 8, 2025 filing date.

Federal Court TMR-20edd173 <a href="https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/trump-orders-pause-on-federal-financial-assistance"> Federal Funding Freeze </a> May 18, 2026
Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support