Doe 1 v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Case Overview
11 civil servants who worked at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the CIA implementing federal civil right laws sued the ODNI and CIA after being placed on administrative leave due to their assignments related to DEIA. Plaintiffs allege this violates the Administrative Procedures Act, the Administrative Leave Act, the First Amendment, and the Fifth Amendment.
The Application
The plaintiffs contend that their placement on administrative leave was retaliatory and targeted specifically at their prior work implementing federal civil rights laws, constituting viewpoint retaliation and procedural violations. The government must justify the administrative leave as a legitimate policy action rather than pretextual retaliation for protected conduct.
The Conclusion
The case remains active in the Eastern District of Virginia (filed Feb. 17, 2025) before Judge Anthony J. Trenga with no final judgment; the outcome will depend on whether the court finds the removal was pretextual retaliation or a lawful exercise of agency discretion in changing civil rights policies.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support